Skip to main content
DLI Advisory

Policy becomes useful when institutions can act on it.

International student policy moves quickly. Institutions need advice that is accurate enough for risk decisions and clear enough for teams to use.

Immigration pathway reviews

Structured review of recruitment, admissions, compliance communications and student support against current immigration realities. We identify where students most often lose momentum and where clearer information helps.

Refusal trends and referral frameworks

Careful reading of refusal patterns without promising outcomes. Where useful, we help institutions think about referral frameworks for students whose files require specialist attention.

Policy briefings and staff training

Plain-language briefings on federal and provincial change and, where scoped, working sessions for advising and recruitment teams.

Internationalization and recruitment strategy

Strategy work grounded in student pathway realities: source-country patterns, program design and the practical friction students face inside the immigration system.

Escalation and complex-case triage

A senior-level review process for a small number of complex individual matters where an institution needs a second set of professional eyes.

Typical engagements

Formats we most often work in.

Leadership briefing

Market or program review

Staff workshop

Student-pathway audit

Referral protocol

Issue-specific advisory

Karan's relevant experience

Karan Pratap Singh advises Canadian designated learning institutions on internationalization, international student recruitment strategy and immigration-related student pathways. His work supports institutional teams in reading policy change carefully and translating it into operational decisions.

We are careful about the shape of this work. Advising an institution does not make us counsel to every designated learning institution and does not imply endorsement of any institution by government.

Institutional advisory does not replace an institution's legal, regulatory, privacy or academic-governance obligations. Institutions should continue to work with their own counsel and internal offices on matters that fall within those responsibilities. Information reviewed July 2026.

Speak with Karan about an institutional mandate.

Tell us the question your team is trying to answer. We will suggest the most useful shape for an initial conversation.